Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1148
|
Posted - 2014.05.09 19:21:00 -
[1] - Quote
Malcanis wrote:Money Makin Mitch wrote:I'm pretty ticked off that I wasted 10d x6 training a skill to 5 that I didn't need and is now being removed from the game.
I trained that skill abut 6 years ago. It was worth it for me then, and it was worth it for you when you trained it. Dunno if that's going to be the case really for anyone who didn't have it prior to the blog. 7 days is a notable chunk of 2 months and has a rather significant determination over what can be trained in that time. Any efficient training plan would probably forgo training level V at the time the clarification was posted.
|

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1157
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 20:53:00 -
[2] - Quote
Tippia wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Except, you know, the training advantage that I had. Against some it's being reduced (mostly by a very minute amount); against others, it's being increased. But sure, that's actually the only reasonable complaint and it is completely different from the whole SP/time/onozCCPdidn'tsendmeanemail complaint that people bring up. Where would we see an increase in advantage? Given the way the skills are cloning it should be impossible to lose effectiveness. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1157
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 21:50:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Where would we see an increase in advantage? Against anyone who has the skills trained at a lower level than you do. I guess I'm missing something here. Someone who doesn't have the skills trained isn't losing anything save potential training time which, according to the way this is being handled, isn't a factor. Performance wise they will either remain the same or gain.
Edit: No, actually that isn't entirely true, those without DI V will be closer to those with DI V post patch intentionally. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1157
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 21:59:00 -
[4] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:I guess I'm missing something here. Probably the word GÇ£trainingGÇ¥ in GÇ£training advantageGÇ¥.  To get the same advantages as you have now, people will in the future have to train for longer. Quote:Performance wise they will either remain the same or gain. Yes, but the training required to get that performance will increase, and so will the gaps between the different stages of having the skills trained. Maybe I misunderstood the nature of James' complaint then. I took it to mean that what he was losing was the performance difference he trained for, rather than the training time change.
Edit: Actually, he's losing in training advantage as you describe it to anyone who trained SDO V but CDO to anything less than V. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1157
|
Posted - 2014.05.14 23:51:00 -
[5] - Quote
Hasikan Miallok wrote:Walter Hart White wrote:If someone decides to train CDO to V because of dev blog they lost the days they trained it. That is the loss. If your using drones you got the advantage of the extra medium drone damage the whole time. If your not actually using drones why do you care and why on earth bother training it. Or do people just collect SP for the sake of it ? meh ... CCP may well reimburse and if they do fine. Free SP is good SP as you can allocate to skills that kinda suck on your current remap and get 8 days for 7 days. However whining on forums and throwing tantrums is if anything going to make it LESS likely, Considering were talking about 2 months, as we're only addressing those who trained it based on the blog, were it not something I'd already had for a considerable amount of time and I knew the final resolution that was decided upon there is no way I'd train CDO beyond whatever level I had it. Using 7 days to get 5% for 2 months seems like a horrible return on time investment compared to just about anything else I could train that isn't going to be handed to me. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1158
|
Posted - 2014.05.15 00:06:00 -
[6] - Quote
Glathull wrote:Just a quick question here. Based on Tippia's chart, it looks like if I get Scout Drone Operation to V before the change, I will be rewarded with 3 skills at level V. Is that correct? Or is there something else I need to do to get max advantage from this change? SDO V is all you need to capitalize on the changes. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1159
|
Posted - 2014.05.15 04:47:00 -
[7] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:beakerax wrote:I can understand the complaint here. In prior skill changes, CCP has given a massive SP advantage to older players (say, those with Command Ships trained) at the expense of both existing new players (without Battlecruisers V or Command Ships) and hypothetical future new players. This change only gives old players (SDO V + CDO V) an advantage over the unborn future new players, not the existing new-ish players (SDO V + CDO less than V). That is clearly inconsistent and unfair.
The obvious solution is to reward everyone who trained both skills to V with Combat Drone Operation - Elite trade items. Or possibly a Civilian Hobgoblin. Uh, Command Ships didn't give people an SP advantage. It's actually faster for a new player to train to CS than it was before. And the pre-skills are useful in any ship when a squad commander now. At least know what you are talking about when you complain about things. Vertical progression also got slightly shorter despite adding Destroyers and BC skills if I recall correctly. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1161
|
Posted - 2014.05.15 22:31:00 -
[8] - Quote
Marlona Sky wrote:So how much does the Gecko lose in DPS when the skill change happens? Assuming drone interfacing V: 25% of whatever you are getting now. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1161
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 00:54:00 -
[9] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Tippia wrote:Nar' alk Breau wrote:Wanting reimbursement for the time you invested isn't selfish. It is if the time you invested is somehow lost, which it isn't in this case. Well yes it is, because I trained both SDO 5 and CDO 5, and getting exactly what I would have gotten had I trained just SDO 5 and not even injected CDO. You didn't lose anything. Someone with SDO 5 and CDO 5 with retain all of the perks they currently have after the update. No bonuses were lost by you. I didn't lose anything when the learning skills were removed due to the base attribute increases. That was still refunded.
|

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1161
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 01:00:00 -
[10] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Those learning skills were not replaced by an equal or greater number of different skills. So then the removal can mirror the change to the old agent skill, preserving training decisions and completing the switch over.
|

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1161
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 01:05:00 -
[11] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:I didn't lose anything when the learning skills were removed due to the base attribute increases. That was still refunded. Yes you did. You lost the ability to increase your attributes through skill bonuses. Since that ability was gone, you got back the SP that only served the purpose of providing that ability. Losing the ability to increase attributes through skills was a direct result of the skill removal, and was double compensated, first through SP trained then by ability. And since the plan was established based upon preserving ability, why can't training be preserved along side it as was done there?
I'm not even saying it should, but I curious as to the logic that says so adamantly that it shouldn't. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1161
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 01:08:00 -
[12] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Nar' alk Breau wrote: No, this answer doesn't change the fact that existing people are getting an advantage without the time investment.
We have numerous precedents from CCP to show that this isn't a problem. Loss of advantage does not constitute a need for reimbursement. Please see: The scanning overhaul, Astrometrics, and Astrometric Rangefinding in particular. People that had Astro 5/rangefinding 5 lost alot of advantage compared to people that only had astro 4 and **** support skills post odyssey. No reimbursement occurred. Wasn't the advantage there just moved to another form? |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1161
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 01:21:00 -
[13] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Losing the ability to increase attributes through skills was a direct result of the skill removal, and was double compensated, first through SP trained then by ability. No. They could have removed the ability and let you keep the useless skills. Instead, they removed the ability to gain additional attribute points and, since the skills no longer served any purpose, you got your training time back. It was also only compensated once: by the SP reimbursement. The increase in attributes was not an ability: it was an across-the-board stat boost that was wholly disconnected from all kinds of abilities or skills. Quote:And since the plan was established based upon preserving ability, why can't training be preserved along side it as was done there? That's exactly what they're doing: the abilities you trained for are being preserved. The only difference is that, as it happens, the straightened-out skill path means that some abilities will now be coupled with different abilities than before. It can't be done the way they did with learning skills because in that case, there was no preservation of ability since the whole point of the change was to remove that ability. Instead, you got your time back. Getting your time back doesn't make sense in this case because the abilities can be (and are being) preserved. After all, the abilities themselves don't actually change GÇö they're just being moved around on the skill tree. Actually there was a preservation of ability, though that ability was training speed, rather than training for training speed. Had it simply been a strait removal and reimbursement for time there would have been a training time nerf.
Similarly a person with SDO V loses the ability to train the new skills where they might otherwise have had the ability to do so depending upon CDO level. The only difference in this case is that the granted capabilities lie in skill form rather than being able to be directly inherited in static for by the character. That's the only distinction I see, and I don't necessarily think it obvious that it should be handled differently based upon that. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1161
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 02:22:00 -
[14] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Actually there was a preservation of ability, though that ability was training speed, rather than training for training speed. That's not an ability, though, nor was it preserved. Training is a core mechanic; the ability removed was the method to speed it up. Quote:Similarly a person with SDO V loses the ability to train the new skills where they might otherwise have had the ability to do so depending upon CDO level. SoGǪ really, it's the SDO V guys that should be reimbursed because of their lost ability?  Gavin Dax wrote:But the advantage wasn't eliminated, which is what the problem is here. The skill did not become useless. It was the exact same kind of GÇ£advantageGÇ¥ as people are talking about here, and no skill is being rendered useless. Some advantages were simply had through different means than before and people ended up with equal ability where they previously were equal. Even so, the guiding principle was that no ability was lost GÇö if you happened to gain some in the process, then good for you. Training is a core mechanic, but that doesn't mean it can't be altered or portions of it changed, nor does it mean it's not an ability. Rather the designation of core mechanic only states that that ability is integral to the working of progression within the game.
The ability to speed up training was separate, but as you said it existed to speed up training, which is what the attribute increase did. No one trained the skills for the sake of training the skills, they trained for the affect and that was preserved without including the SP reimbursement. The SP reimbursement was for time, not the loss of an ability to train for faster training, which doesn't make sense to compensate since it's explicitly being eliminated was the goal of the change. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1161
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 02:42:00 -
[15] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Training is a core mechanic, but that doesn't mean it can't be altered or portions of it changed, nor does it mean it's not an ability. It definitely keeps it from being an ability, unless you also consider things like opening the market window or looking at the star map an ability. It's not something that characterises a character or account GÇö it's just a basic functionality. And again, the actual ability in question was not preserved. That's why the skills were reimbursed: because the ability they were meant to provide had been removed, and since that rendered the skills pointless, they were removed too. Quote:The SP reimbursement was for time, not the loss of an ability to train for faster training. The SP reimbursement was for skills that no longer provided the ability they were supposed to, since that ability was removed from the game. Had the skills been revamped into something different, there might not have been a reimbursement since your training would still have afforded you some kind of ability that set your character apart from others. Actually the ability that was removed was deemed to be detrimental, but CCP chose to compensate the time spent investing in it. Furthermore they decided to provide the advantage of training speeds as granted by the skills in the form of attribute points.
There was no worth in the ability to train for the improvement of training, but there was worth in improved training. That was the entire point of the change. Thus losing something that had no worth that only served as a barrier to something with worth was a benefit in itself and thus not something that needs compensation.
As far as ability vs basic functionality, there are a lot more interactions that go on in skill training than opening the market window. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1161
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 03:06:00 -
[16] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Actually the ability that was removed was deemed to be detrimental, but CCP chose to compensate the time spent investing in it. Furthermore they decided to provide the advantage of training speeds as granted by the skills in the form of attribute points. GǪand in doing so, the ability to alter your training speeds was replaced by a fixed increase in all training speeds everywhere. At best, a parallel could be drawn between that ability and the remap mechanic, but that one is more accurately a replacement for the static bloodline bonuses. You lost me here, the ability to change something doesn't seem to be able to be compensated by simply increasing it. You can compensate the effect of an upward change, but that method of actually causing change is gone for good with no workaround (excluding perhaps remaps/implants, but those arguably can't be compensation either as the coexisted, also the bloodline thing as you mentioned). Though, either way it still pairs the AP change with the loss of functionality by this logic, not the SP refund.
Further an SP refund can't actually compensate for functionality changes either, only time invested into a mechanic that was removed (learning skills) or changed (social skills).
Tippia wrote:Quote:Thus losing something that had no worth that only served as a barrier to something with worth was a benefit in itself and thus not something that needs compensation. WeeellGǪ it had a value. It just didn't make up for the costs it incurred in terms of player annoyance and follow-on effects.  I suppose if being a PITA is value, sure. I certainly don't miss them |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1161
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 03:22:00 -
[17] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:You lost me here, the ability to change something doesn't seem to be able to be compensated by simply increasing it. Yes. That was my point: the ability could not be compensated for, so the skills became worthless and had to be reimbursed. I'm answering what you said about how the skills were doubly compensated GÇö I'm saying they were only compensated once (through the SP reimbursement). I think we might have one of those GÇ£aggressively agreeingGÇ¥ situations here.  Probably, try as I might I'm just not getting the same logic flow to work for me. My understanding was:
- Training for training was bad for various reasons and is being removed. - Training times are being buffed to the top end for everyone to effectively avoid nerfing training - Here's the time you invested back as SP
SP for the ability to train for training doesn't necessarily make sense since, as you pointed out with SDO V characters, the ability was held most by the people with the least investment, yet they received the least reimbursement. After all if you completed the learning skills folder you no longer had the ability to train for faster learning, and your refund for that loss would equally be 0. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1161
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 20:25:00 -
[18] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:ah, but cdo gives 5% drone damage per level. training sdo has never given 5% damage per level.
we don't have anyone complaining that everyone who trained sdo5 and cdo0 is getting free 25% drone damage, do we? Not sure if sarcasm. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1161
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 20:42:00 -
[19] - Quote
Benny Ohu wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Which has nothing to do with this. i think it's hilarious is what it's got to do with this it's players who trained mining barge v to unlock orcas complaining that someone else can unlock orcas without mining barge v. in both cases, it's players whining that another player will be able to do something the speaker can already do with a little less training, and demanding reimbursement Difference being CDO V only has 1 function which is being given to everyone, but people with mining barge at less than V didn't get max bonused barges. Similar, but a notable difference. There is NO function of CDO which people who trained SDO V won't have, there are plenty of functions of mining barge V that people with a lower level won't have despite getting orca access at III.
|

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1162
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 21:58:00 -
[20] - Quote
Estella Osoka wrote:Tyberius Franklin wrote:Estella Osoka wrote:Mario Putzo wrote:Estella Osoka wrote: And the changes to drones are the same thing. CCP is rebalancing drones to be more inline with the game. Something they should have done years ago. Adding those 2 new skills and removing CDO is part of that process.
Ya because CCP totally removed Warhead Upgrades when they retooled the mechanics of missiles last year, Oh wait nope that skill is still there. Whine moar please. If you don't like the changes, you don't have to play. Bottomline is CCP isn't taking away skill/ skillpoints, so no free SP. Nope, they're just exchanging them, which has been refunded in the past (social skills) Those "social skills" were removed from the game. There was 5 and they were reduced to 3. CDO is being removed as well.
It should also be noted thet the new skills had higher multipliers than the old ones in the social skill swap, thus making it so that there wasn't necessarily a surplus of SP created. |

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1162
|
Posted - 2014.05.16 22:09:00 -
[21] - Quote
Mario Putzo wrote:Malcanis wrote:In just one more day, people in this thread will have spent longer complaining about the skill than they took to train it. False! i have already argued longer than it took me to train it. I used SP from learning skills to bump both SDO and CDO to level 5.  I trained it normally, but since training is passive I have more time to argue. |
|
|